In high school my teacher believed that a life was best understood through poetry. My teacher loved poetry. I did not like poetry. I did not know how to love words or otherwise. And I could not imagine words enough to make my world any better. But, I did like her. I compared her to sunsets and music. Her favourite piece- If by Rudyard Kipling fed anger and angst into starved souls for many students, mostly because our particular cohort was filled with scientists and carpenters, mathematicians and athletes- so English class as a rule existed outside their practical minds. If could not exist without then. Poetry was an abstract maze. Impenetrable. And inescapable. Kipling and high school expected us to delay our gratification, to live up to expectations, and to slow down enough to notice. Rudyard wanted us to wait, and to be lied to, and not to look too good, and be skeptics of truth and our friends, and not to cry or hold friends close, and to start over, again and again and again and never breathe a pained word of it. And then, in the end, accept that others will blame you for their same misfortune. English class became too much with all of the if this and if that. Even if I could break with habit, I understood inference quite well and the message was that even if I suffered nothing would be learned from it. And likely, when I am most broken someone will likely say if you'd only done things differently then ...
Leave a reply to Melanie White Cancel reply